Rwanda vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value

Rwanda
17,610 million SLC
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
19,666 million SLC
in 2023
Rwanda rank
31st
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
29th

Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time

  • Rwanda
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200120122024

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 19,666 million SLC against 17,610 million SLC in Rwanda, a difference of 2,056 million SLC.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 31st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 29th of 93 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 9,114 million SLC 14,542 million SLC 5,428 million SLC United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 15,892 million SLC 17,280 million SLC 1,387 million SLC United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Rwanda or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 19,666 million SLC against 17,610 million SLC in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Rwanda and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
2,056 million SLC, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
Rwanda ranks 31st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 29th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-general-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/rwanda/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-general-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/rwanda/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Rwanda vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 1,736 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.