Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Rwanda: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 17,610 million SLC against 15,753 million SLC in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 1,857 million SLC.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 93 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10,380 million SLC | 9,114 million SLC | 1,266 million SLC | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
| 2020s | 13,504 million SLC | 15,892 million SLC | 2,388 million SLC | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 17,610 million SLC against 15,753 million SLC in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Rwanda?
- 1,857 million SLC, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Rwanda?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Rwanda rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 31st of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.