Namibia vs Slovenia: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Namibia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 597.23 million SLC against 427.45 million SLC in Namibia, a difference of 169.78 million SLC.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 65th of 93 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 419.93 million SLC | 236.31 million SLC | 183.62 million SLC | Namibia |
| 2020s | 407.24 million SLC | 415.3 million SLC | 8.06 million SLC | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Namibia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 597.23 million SLC against 427.45 million SLC in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Namibia and Slovenia?
- 169.78 million SLC, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Slovenia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Slovenia rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Namibia ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 65th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.