Kazakhstan vs Mongolia: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 426,817 million SLC against 288,433 million SLC in Mongolia, a difference of 138,384 million SLC.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.5 times Mongolia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 6th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 93 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,186 million SLC | 735.74 million SLC | 2,450 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 110,039 million SLC | 50,667 million SLC | 59,373 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 358,076 million SLC | 217,306 million SLC | 140,771 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Kazakhstan or Mongolia?
- Kazakhstan, at 426,817 million SLC against 288,433 million SLC in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 138,384 million SLC, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mongolia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mongolia rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 6th and Mongolia ranks 9th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.