Hungary vs Türkiye: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Hungary
- Türkiye
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 434,849 million SLC against 84,826 million SLC in Türkiye, a difference of 350,023 million SLC.
That makes Hungary's figure about 5.1 times Türkiye's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 93 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 161,918 million SLC | 3,506 million SLC | 158,412 million SLC | Hungary |
| 2010s | 268,107 million SLC | 8,382 million SLC | 259,725 million SLC | Hungary |
| 2020s | 404,169 million SLC | 35,324 million SLC | 368,845 million SLC | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Hungary or Türkiye?
- Hungary, at 434,849 million SLC against 84,826 million SLC in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Hungary and Türkiye?
- 350,023 million SLC, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Türkiye?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Türkiye rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Hungary ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.