Hungary vs Kazakhstan: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Hungary
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 434,849 million SLC against 426,817 million SLC in Kazakhstan, a difference of 8,032 million SLC.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 6th of 93 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 144,185 million SLC | 10,764 million SLC | 133,421 million SLC | Hungary |
| 2010s | 268,107 million SLC | 75,479 million SLC | 192,628 million SLC | Hungary |
| 2020s | 404,169 million SLC | 335,411 million SLC | 68,758 million SLC | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Hungary or Kazakhstan?
- Hungary, at 434,849 million SLC against 426,817 million SLC in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Hungary and Kazakhstan?
- 8,032 million SLC, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Kazakhstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Kazakhstan rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Hungary ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 6th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.