Dominican Republic vs Italy: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Dominican Republic
- Italy
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 20,062 million SLC against 19,072 million SLC in Italy, a difference of 990 million SLC.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Italy ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 28th and Italy ranks 30th of 93 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10,399 million SLC | 15,363 million SLC | 4,964 million SLC | Italy |
| 2020s | 16,568 million SLC | 17,760 million SLC | 1,192 million SLC | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Dominican Republic or Italy?
- Dominican Republic, at 20,062 million SLC against 19,072 million SLC in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Dominican Republic and Italy?
- 990 million SLC, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Italy?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Italy rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Dominican Republic ranks 28th and Italy ranks 30th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.