China, Hong Kong SAR vs Sweden: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Sweden
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 38,500 million SLC against 34,982 million SLC in Sweden, a difference of 3,518 million SLC.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 22nd of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,226 million SLC | 10,245 million SLC | 1,018 million SLC | Sweden |
| 2010s | 16,150 million SLC | 17,474 million SLC | 1,324 million SLC | Sweden |
| 2020s | 34,300 million SLC | 32,855 million SLC | 1,445 million SLC | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Sweden?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 38,500 million SLC against 34,982 million SLC in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 3,518 million SLC, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Sweden rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 22nd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.