China, Hong Kong SAR vs Pakistan: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 51,631 million SLC against 38,500 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 13,131 million SLC.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 19th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 93 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18,758 million SLC | 8,614 million SLC | 10,144 million SLC | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 34,300 million SLC | 27,289 million SLC | 7,011 million SLC | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 51,631 million SLC against 38,500 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Pakistan?
- 13,131 million SLC, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Pakistan rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 19th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.