Belgium vs Israel: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Belgium
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 10,723 million SLC against 7,161 million SLC in Belgium, a difference of 3,562 million SLC.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.5 times Belgium's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 43rd and Israel ranks 40th of 93 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,675 million SLC | 3,959 million SLC | 1,284 million SLC | Israel |
| 2010s | 4,958 million SLC | 6,459 million SLC | 1,501 million SLC | Israel |
| 2020s | 6,881 million SLC | 8,988 million SLC | 2,107 million SLC | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Belgium or Israel?
- Israel, at 10,723 million SLC against 7,161 million SLC in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Belgium and Israel?
- 3,562 million SLC, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Israel?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Israel rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Belgium ranks 43rd and Israel ranks 40th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.