Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 16.77 million USD against 1.96 million USD in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 14.81 million USD.
That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 8.6 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 9 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 16.77 million USD against 1.96 million USD in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 14.81 million USD, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.