Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$

Micronesia (Federated States of)
1.71 million USD
in 2020
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
3,694 million USD
in 2023
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
8th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
9th

Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time

  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200120122023

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 3,694 million USD against 1.71 million USD in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 3,692 million USD.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 2,160.0 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 9th of 9 countries.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (Federated States of) Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
2000s 0.63 million USD 2,626 million USD 2,625 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 1.02 million USD 1,343 million USD 1,342 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 1.71 million USD 2,041 million USD 2,039 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 3,694 million USD against 1.71 million USD in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
3,692 million USD, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 9th of 9 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-us/micronesia-federated-states-of/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-us/micronesia-federated-states-of/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 2,863 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.