Japan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Japan
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 5,085 million USD against 16.77 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 5,068 million USD.
That makes Japan's figure about 303.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 155 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,043 million USD | 116.07 million USD | 10,927 million USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 9,662 million USD | 137.08 million USD | 9,525 million USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 7,326 million USD | 4.44 million USD | 7,321 million USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, Japan or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Japan, at 5,085 million USD against 16.77 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Japan and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 5,068 million USD, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Japan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Japan ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.