France vs Japan: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- France
- Japan
How they compare
France currently reports 5,965 million USD against 5,085 million USD in Japan, a difference of 880 million USD.
That makes France's figure about 1.2 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.
France ranks 4th and Japan ranks 6th of 155 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,698 million USD | 11,053 million USD | 7,356 million USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 3,795 million USD | 9,662 million USD | 5,867 million USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 5,229 million USD | 6,765 million USD | 1,536 million USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, France or Japan?
- France, at 5,965 million USD against 5,085 million USD in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between France and Japan?
- 880 million USD, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Japan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do France and Japan rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- France ranks 4th and Japan ranks 6th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.