Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Timor-Leste: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 15.78 million USD against 1.28 million USD in Timor-Leste, a difference of 14.5 million USD.
That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 12.3 times Timor-Leste's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Timor-Leste ranks 9th of 9 countries.
Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Timor-Leste?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 15.78 million USD against 1.28 million USD in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Timor-Leste?
- 14.5 million USD, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Timor-Leste?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Timor-Leste rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Timor-Leste ranks 9th of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.