Canada vs Germany: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Canada
- Germany
How they compare
Canada currently reports 17,495 million USD against 7,363 million USD in Germany, a difference of 10,132 million USD.
That makes Canada's figure about 2.4 times Germany's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Germany ahead.
Canada ranks 1st and Germany ranks 3rd of 155 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,957 million USD | 4,657 million USD | 2,700 million USD | Germany |
| 2010s | 2,776 million USD | 6,099 million USD | 3,323 million USD | Germany |
| 2020s | 11,135 million USD | 7,028 million USD | 4,107 million USD | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, Canada or Germany?
- Canada, at 17,495 million USD against 7,363 million USD in Germany as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Canada and Germany?
- 10,132 million USD, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Germany?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Germany rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Canada ranks 1st and Germany ranks 3rd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.