Australia vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$

Australia
5,013 million USD
in 2024
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
3,694 million USD
in 2023
Australia rank
7th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
9th

Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time

  • Australia
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
02.0k4.0k6.0k200120122024

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5,013 million USD against 3,694 million USD in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 1,319 million USD.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Australia ranks 7th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 9th of 155 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
2000s 749.63 million USD 1,758 million USD 1,008 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 4,181 million USD 1,343 million USD 2,838 million USD Australia
2020s 5,035 million USD 2,601 million USD 2,434 million USD Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, Australia or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Australia, at 5,013 million USD against 3,694 million USD in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2024.
What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Australia and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
1,319 million USD, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Australia and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
Australia ranks 7th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 9th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-us/australia/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-us/australia/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Australia vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 2,863 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.