Australia vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Australia
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 5,013 million USD against 18.12 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 4,995 million USD.
That makes Australia's figure about 276.7 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 4th of 155 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$, Australia or Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
- Australia, at 5,013 million USD against 18.12 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Australia and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
- 4,995 million USD, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2007.
- How do Australia and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Australia ranks 7th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 4th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.