Samoa vs San Marino: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Samoa
- San Marino
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 11.1 million USD against 10.03 million USD in San Marino, a difference of 1.07 million USD.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 119th and San Marino ranks 121st of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.33 million USD | 9.95 million USD | 2.38 million USD | Samoa |
| 2020s | 9.54 million USD | 9.83 million USD | 0.2925 million USD | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Samoa or San Marino?
- Samoa, at 11.1 million USD against 10.03 million USD in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Samoa and San Marino?
- 1.07 million USD, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Samoa and San Marino rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Samoa ranks 119th and San Marino ranks 121st of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.