Republic of Korea vs Timor-Leste: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Republic of Korea
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 5,137 million USD against 1.3 million USD in Timor-Leste, a difference of 5,136 million USD.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 3,951.7 times Timor-Leste's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 6th and Timor-Leste ranks 9th of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 million USD | 0.24 million USD | 0.24 million USD | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 5,137 million USD | 0.32 million USD | 5,137 million USD | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Republic of Korea or Timor-Leste?
- Republic of Korea, at 5,137 million USD against 1.3 million USD in Timor-Leste as of 2010.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Republic of Korea and Timor-Leste?
- 5,136 million USD, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Timor-Leste?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Republic of Korea and Timor-Leste rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Republic of Korea ranks 6th and Timor-Leste ranks 9th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.