China, Macao SAR vs Peru: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Peru
How they compare
China, Macao SAR currently reports 258.83 million USD against 202.2 million USD in Peru, a difference of 56.63 million USD.
That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Peru ahead.
China, Macao SAR ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 46th of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Macao SAR | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 129.61 million USD | 205.69 million USD | 76.07 million USD | Peru |
| 2020s | 245.21 million USD | 190.34 million USD | 54.87 million USD | China, Macao SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, China, Macao SAR or Peru?
- China, Macao SAR, at 258.83 million USD against 202.2 million USD in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between China, Macao SAR and Peru?
- 56.63 million USD, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Peru rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 46th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.