Cabo Verde vs Republic of Moldova: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Cabo Verde
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 14.92 million USD against 9.47 million USD in Cabo Verde, a difference of 5.45 million USD.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.6 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 5th of 3 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.83 million USD | 9.29 million USD | 4.46 million USD | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 14.4 million USD | 13.59 million USD | 0.809 million USD | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 11.79 million USD | 11.16 million USD | 0.63 million USD | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Cabo Verde or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 14.92 million USD against 9.47 million USD in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Cabo Verde and Republic of Moldova?
- 5.45 million USD, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Republic of Moldova?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Republic of Moldova rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 5th of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.