Australia vs Russian Federation: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Australia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 4,422 million USD against 4,137 million USD in Australia, a difference of 285 million USD.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 155 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 902.18 million USD | 411.3 million USD | 490.88 million USD | Australia |
| 2010s | 3,546 million USD | 1,012 million USD | 2,534 million USD | Australia |
| 2020s | 4,277 million USD | 3,873 million USD | 404.45 million USD | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Australia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 4,422 million USD against 4,137 million USD in Australia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Australia and Russian Federation?
- 285 million USD, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Russian Federation?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Australia and Russian Federation rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Australia ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.