Slovenia vs United Arab Emirates: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Slovenia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 529.65 million SLC against 414.65 million SLC in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 115 million SLC.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.3 times United Arab Emirates's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Slovenia ranks 97th and United Arab Emirates ranks 100th of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 224.3 million SLC | 289.23 million SLC | 64.92 million SLC | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 347.74 million SLC | 222.09 million SLC | 125.65 million SLC | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Slovenia or United Arab Emirates?
- Slovenia, at 529.65 million SLC against 414.65 million SLC in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Slovenia and United Arab Emirates?
- 115 million SLC, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and United Arab Emirates?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Slovenia ranks 97th and United Arab Emirates ranks 100th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.