Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value

Republic of Moldova
518 million SLC
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
43,603 million SLC
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k200120122024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 43,603 million SLC against 518 million SLC in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 43,085 million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 84.2 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 9 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 90.43 million SLC 103,181 million SLC 103,090 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 227.98 million SLC 231,466 million SLC 231,238 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 347.12 million SLC 18,574 million SLC 18,227 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Republic of Moldova or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 43,603 million SLC against 518 million SLC in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
43,085 million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
Republic of Moldova ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 9 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 2,863 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.