Republic of Moldova vs Syrian Arab Republic: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 900.73 million SLC against 518 million SLC in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 382.73 million SLC.
That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.7 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 6th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 5th of 9 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Republic of Moldova or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 900.73 million SLC against 518 million SLC in Republic of Moldova as of 2016.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Republic of Moldova and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 382.73 million SLC, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 6th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 5th of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.