Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Uzbekistan: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 205,046 million SLC against 1.71 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 205,044 million SLC.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 10th of 9 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (Federated States of) | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.06 million SLC | 20,170 million SLC | 20,169 million SLC | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 1.71 million SLC | 5,840 million SLC | 5,839 million SLC | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 205,046 million SLC against 1.71 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan?
- 205,044 million SLC, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Uzbekistan ranks 10th of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.