Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Russian Federation: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value

Micronesia (Federated States of)
1.71 million SLC
in 2020
Russian Federation
398,124 million SLC
in 2021
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
8th
Russian Federation rank
6th

Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time

  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • Russian Federation
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200120112021

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 398,124 million SLC against 1.71 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 398,122 million SLC.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 9 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (Federated States of) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 0.63 million SLC 10,250 million SLC 10,249 million SLC Russian Federation
2010s 1.02 million SLC 65,870 million SLC 65,868 million SLC Russian Federation
2020s 1.71 million SLC 251,523 million SLC 251,521 million SLC Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 398,124 million SLC against 1.71 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2021.
What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Russian Federation?
398,122 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Russian Federation?
13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Russian Federation rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 9 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Russian Federation: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/micronesia-federated-states-of/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/micronesia-federated-states-of/russian-federation-2/">Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Russian Federation: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 2,863 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.