Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Mongolia: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 170,717 million SLC against 1.71 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 170,715 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 9 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (Federated States of) | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.11 million SLC | 43,515 million SLC | 43,514 million SLC | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 1.71 million SLC | 130,389 million SLC | 130,387 million SLC | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 170,717 million SLC against 1.71 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Mongolia?
- 170,715 million SLC, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Mongolia rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 11th of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.