Mauritania vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Mauritania
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
How they compare
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 3,416 million SLC against 3,370 million SLC in Mauritania, a difference of 46 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
Mauritania ranks 61st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 60th of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 159.75 million SLC | 1,192 million SLC | 1,032 million SLC | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
| 2020s | 2,551 million SLC | 2,346 million SLC | 204.45 million SLC | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Mauritania or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 3,416 million SLC against 3,370 million SLC in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Mauritania and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 46 million SLC, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Mauritania ranks 61st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 60th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.