Kyrgyzstan vs Mauritania: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 3,370 million SLC against 3,024 million SLC in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 346 million SLC.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 62nd and Mauritania ranks 61st of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 798.6 million SLC | 159.75 million SLC | 638.85 million SLC | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1,075 million SLC | 2,551 million SLC | 1,475 million SLC | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Kyrgyzstan or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 3,370 million SLC against 3,024 million SLC in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Kyrgyzstan and Mauritania?
- 346 million SLC, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mauritania rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 62nd and Mauritania ranks 61st of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.