Kazakhstan vs Uganda: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 120,166 million SLC against 79,840 million SLC in Kazakhstan, a difference of 40,326 million SLC.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Uganda ranks 13th of 155 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,418 million SLC | 23,818 million SLC | 17,400 million SLC | Uganda |
| 2010s | 22,722 million SLC | 104,314 million SLC | 81,592 million SLC | Uganda |
| 2020s | 91,624 million SLC | 103,239 million SLC | 11,615 million SLC | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Kazakhstan or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 120,166 million SLC against 79,840 million SLC in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Kazakhstan and Uganda?
- 40,326 million SLC, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Uganda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Uganda rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 14th and Uganda ranks 13th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.