Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Republic of Korea: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 17.54 million million SLC against 5.37 million million SLC in Republic of Korea, a difference of 12.17 million million SLC.
That makes Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s figure about 3.3 times Republic of Korea's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) has been ahead every year.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 1st and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 9 countries.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Republic of Korea?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 17.54 million million SLC against 5.37 million million SLC in Republic of Korea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Republic of Korea?
- 12.17 million million SLC, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Republic of Korea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2009.
- How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Republic of Korea rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 1st and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 9 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.