Haiti vs Maldives: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Haiti
- Maldives
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 2,018 million SLC against 1,816 million SLC in Maldives, a difference of 202 million SLC.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Maldives ahead.
Haiti ranks 69th and Maldives ranks 72nd of 155 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,116 million SLC | 1,122 million SLC | 994.18 million SLC | Haiti |
| 2020s | 2,174 million SLC | 1,568 million SLC | 606.46 million SLC | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Haiti or Maldives?
- Haiti, at 2,018 million SLC against 1,816 million SLC in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Haiti and Maldives?
- 202 million SLC, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Maldives?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Maldives rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Haiti ranks 69th and Maldives ranks 72nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.