Guinea vs Russian Federation: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Guinea
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 417,414 million SLC against 398,124 million SLC in Russian Federation, a difference of 19,290 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Guinea ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 155 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,241 million SLC | 8,851 million SLC | 2,611 million SLC | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 67,980 million SLC | 65,870 million SLC | 2,110 million SLC | Guinea |
| 2020s | 168,950 million SLC | 324,824 million SLC | 155,874 million SLC | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Guinea or Russian Federation?
- Guinea, at 417,414 million SLC against 398,124 million SLC in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 19,290 million SLC, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Guinea and Russian Federation rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Guinea ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.