Guinea vs Republic of Korea: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Guinea
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 5.37 million million SLC against 417,414 million SLC in Guinea, a difference of 4.95 million million SLC.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 12.9 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 5th and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,218 million SLC | 0 million SLC | 7,218 million SLC | Guinea |
| 2010s | 21,800 million SLC | 5.37 million million SLC | 5.35 million million SLC | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Guinea or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 5.37 million million SLC against 417,414 million SLC in Guinea as of 2010.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Guinea and Republic of Korea?
- 4.95 million million SLC, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Republic of Korea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2010.
- How do Guinea and Republic of Korea rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Guinea ranks 5th and Republic of Korea ranks 2nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.