Czechia vs Philippines: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Czechia
- Philippines
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 23,923 million SLC against 23,911 million SLC in Philippines, a difference of 12 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 23rd of 155 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15,643 million SLC | 8,731 million SLC | 6,912 million SLC | Czechia |
| 2010s | 24,615 million SLC | 17,443 million SLC | 7,172 million SLC | Czechia |
| 2020s | 22,155 million SLC | 24,295 million SLC | 2,140 million SLC | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Czechia or Philippines?
- Czechia, at 23,923 million SLC against 23,911 million SLC in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Czechia and Philippines?
- 12 million SLC, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Philippines?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Philippines rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Czechia ranks 22nd and Philippines ranks 23rd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.