Colombia vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Colombia
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1.02 million million SLC against 43,861 million SLC in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 975,799 million SLC.
That makes Colombia's figure about 23.2 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 3rd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd of 155 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 407,938 million SLC | 45,015 million SLC | 362,923 million SLC | Colombia |
| 2020s | 654,750 million SLC | 58,904 million SLC | 595,846 million SLC | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Colombia or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- Colombia, at 1.02 million million SLC against 43,861 million SLC in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Colombia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 975,799 million SLC, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Colombia ranks 3rd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.