Cabo Verde vs Japan: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Cabo Verde
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 714,400 million SLC against 1,128 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 713,272 million SLC.
That makes Japan's figure about 633.4 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 4th of 3 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 439.62 million SLC | 1.38 million million SLC | 1.38 million million SLC | Japan |
| 2010s | 1,438 million SLC | 951,380 million SLC | 949,942 million SLC | Japan |
| 2020s | 1,298 million SLC | 801,125 million SLC | 799,827 million SLC | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Cabo Verde or Japan?
- Japan, at 714,400 million SLC against 1,128 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Cabo Verde and Japan?
- 713,272 million SLC, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Japan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Japan rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Japan ranks 4th of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.