Benin vs Czechia: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Benin
- Czechia
How they compare
Benin currently reports 53,485 million SLC against 23,923 million SLC in Czechia, a difference of 29,562 million SLC.
That makes Benin's figure about 2.2 times Czechia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 19th and Czechia ranks 22nd of 155 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 89,599 million SLC | 14,094 million SLC | 75,505 million SLC | Benin |
| 2020s | 149,823 million SLC | 22,155 million SLC | 127,668 million SLC | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Benin or Czechia?
- Benin, at 53,485 million SLC against 23,923 million SLC in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Benin and Czechia?
- 29,562 million SLC, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Czechia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Benin and Czechia rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Benin ranks 19th and Czechia ranks 22nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.