Argentina vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Argentina
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 247,382 million SLC against 142.23 million SLC in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 247,240 million SLC.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1,739.3 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
Argentina ranks 9th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 7th of 155 countries.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Argentina or Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
- Argentina, at 247,382 million SLC against 142.23 million SLC in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Argentina and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
- 247,240 million SLC, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2007.
- How do Argentina and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Argentina ranks 9th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 7th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.