Andorra vs Brunei Darussalam: Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value over time
- Andorra
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 17.26 million SLC against 16.88 million SLC in Andorra, a difference of 0.38 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Andorra ahead.
Andorra ranks 133rd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 132nd of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Andorra averaged higher in 1 and Brunei Darussalam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.59 million SLC | 15.7 million SLC | 0.89 million SLC | Andorra |
| 2020s | 14.99 million SLC | 15.8 million SLC | 0.81 million SLC | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value, Andorra or Brunei Darussalam?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 17.26 million SLC against 16.88 million SLC in Andorra as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value between Andorra and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0.38 million SLC, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Brunei Darussalam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Andorra and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for environmental protection (central government expenditure) — value?
- Andorra ranks 133rd and Brunei Darussalam ranks 132nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.