New Zealand vs South Africa: Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax

New Zealand
24.44 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
South Africa
23.57 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
New Zealand rank
16th
South Africa rank
19th

Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax over time

  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
0102030200020122025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 24.44 Percentage of taxable income against 23.57 Percentage of taxable income in South Africa, a difference of 0.87 Percentage of taxable income.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 19th of 41 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 28.28 Percentage of taxable income 25.57 Percentage of taxable income 2.7 Percentage of taxable income New Zealand
2010s 24.61 Percentage of taxable income 24.44 Percentage of taxable income 0.174 Percentage of taxable income New Zealand
2020s 24.44 Percentage of taxable income 23.86 Percentage of taxable income 0.58 Percentage of taxable income New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax, New Zealand or South Africa?
New Zealand, at 24.44 Percentage of taxable income against 23.57 Percentage of taxable income in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax between New Zealand and South Africa?
0.87 Percentage of taxable income, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and South Africa rank globally for effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax?
New Zealand ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 19th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs South Africa: Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-for-income-based-tax-incentives-corporate-tax-statistics-effective/new-zealand/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-for-income-based-tax-incentives-corporate-tax-statistics-effective/new-zealand/south-africa/">New Zealand vs South Africa: Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average tax rate
Unit
Percentage of taxable income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
49 places, 927 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators that capture the effect of income-based R&D tax incentives on firms’ investment costs: The EATR for R&D measures the impact of taxation on R&D investments that earn an economic profit. the user cost of capital for R&D measures the return that a firm needs to realise on an R&D investment before tax to offset all costs and taxes that arise from the investment, making zero economic profit. Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.