Malta vs Nidwalden: Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax
Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax over time
- Malta
- Nidwalden
How they compare
Malta currently reports 30.55 Percentage of taxable income against 13 Percentage of taxable income in Nidwalden, a difference of 17.55 Percentage of taxable income.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.4 times Nidwalden's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 4th and Nidwalden ranks 5th of 41 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax, Malta or Nidwalden?
- Malta, at 30.55 Percentage of taxable income against 13 Percentage of taxable income in Nidwalden as of 2018.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax between Malta and Nidwalden?
- 17.55 Percentage of taxable income, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nidwalden?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Malta and Nidwalden rank globally for effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax?
- Malta ranks 4th and Nidwalden ranks 5th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators that capture the effect of income-based R&D tax incentives on firms’ investment costs: The EATR for R&D measures the impact of taxation on R&D investments that earn an economic profit. the user cost of capital for R&D measures the return that a firm needs to realise on an R&D investment before tax to offset all costs and taxes that arise from the investment, making zero economic profit. Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.