Japan vs Peru: Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax
Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax over time
- Japan
- Peru
How they compare
Japan currently reports 26.16 Percentage of taxable income against 25.75 Percentage of taxable income in Peru, a difference of 0.41 Percentage of taxable income.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 13th and Peru ranks 15th of 41 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.97 Percentage of taxable income | 25.66 Percentage of taxable income | 9.32 Percentage of taxable income | Japan |
| 2010s | 31.1 Percentage of taxable income | 25.48 Percentage of taxable income | 5.62 Percentage of taxable income | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax, Japan or Peru?
- Japan, at 26.16 Percentage of taxable income against 25.75 Percentage of taxable income in Peru as of 2016.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax between Japan and Peru?
- 0.41 Percentage of taxable income, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Peru?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Japan and Peru rank globally for effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - corporate tax?
- Japan ranks 13th and Peru ranks 15th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates for income based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Effective average tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators that capture the effect of income-based R&D tax incentives on firms’ investment costs: The EATR for R&D measures the impact of taxation on R&D investments that earn an economic profit. the user cost of capital for R&D measures the return that a firm needs to realise on an R&D investment before tax to offset all costs and taxes that arise from the investment, making zero economic profit. Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.