Lithuania vs Poland: Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate

Lithuania
-17.29 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
Poland
-17.6 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
Lithuania rank
49th
Poland rank
50th

Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate over time

  • Lithuania
  • Poland
-18-16-14-12-10201920222025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -17.29 Percentage of taxable income against -17.6 Percentage of taxable income in Poland, a difference of 0.31 Percentage of taxable income.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Poland ahead.

Lithuania ranks 49th and Poland ranks 50th of 50 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Poland Difference Ahead
2010s -16.21 Percentage of taxable income -10.76 Percentage of taxable income 5.45 Percentage of taxable income Poland
2020s -16.39 Percentage of taxable income -15.32 Percentage of taxable income 1.07 Percentage of taxable income Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - corporate, Lithuania or Poland?
Lithuania, at -17.29 Percentage of taxable income against -17.6 Percentage of taxable income in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - corporate between Lithuania and Poland?
0.31 Percentage of taxable income, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Poland?
7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Poland rank globally for effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - corporate?
Lithuania ranks 49th and Poland ranks 50th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Implicit subsidy (EATR). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Poland: Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-for-expenditure-based-tax-incentives-corporate-tax-statistics-2/lithuania/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-for-expenditure-based-tax-incentives-corporate-tax-statistics-2/lithuania/poland/">Lithuania vs Poland: Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Implicit subsidy (EATR)
Unit
Percentage of taxable income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 385 data points, 2019–2025
Last refreshed

This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators that capture the effect of expenditure-based R&D tax incentives on firms’ investment costs: The EATR for R&D measures the impact of taxation on R&D investments that earn an economic profit. the user cost of capital for R&D measures the return that a firm needs to realise on an R&D investment before tax to offset all costs and taxes that arise from the investment, making zero economic profit. Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.