Australia vs Finland: Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate

Australia
-4.8 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
Finland
-5.59 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
Australia rank
19th
Finland rank
21st

Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate over time

  • Australia
  • Finland
-6-4-20201920222025

How they compare

Australia currently reports -4.8 Percentage of taxable income against -5.59 Percentage of taxable income in Finland, a difference of 0.79 Percentage of taxable income.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Finland ahead.

Australia ranks 19th and Finland ranks 21st of 50 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Finland Difference Ahead
2010s -4.8 Percentage of taxable income 0 Percentage of taxable income 4.8 Percentage of taxable income Finland
2020s -4.8 Percentage of taxable income -2.87 Percentage of taxable income 1.93 Percentage of taxable income Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - corporate, Australia or Finland?
Australia, at -4.8 Percentage of taxable income against -5.59 Percentage of taxable income in Finland as of 2025.
What is the difference in effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - corporate between Australia and Finland?
0.79 Percentage of taxable income, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
How do Australia and Finland rank globally for effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - corporate?
Australia ranks 19th and Finland ranks 21st of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Implicit subsidy (EATR). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Finland: Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-for-expenditure-based-tax-incentives-corporate-tax-statistics-2/australia/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-for-expenditure-based-tax-incentives-corporate-tax-statistics-2/australia/finland/">Australia vs Finland: Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Effective tax rates for expenditure based tax incentives - Corporate tax statistics — Implicit subsidy (EATR)
Unit
Percentage of taxable income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
55 places, 385 data points, 2019–2025
Last refreshed

This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators that capture the effect of expenditure-based R&D tax incentives on firms’ investment costs: The EATR for R&D measures the impact of taxation on R&D investments that earn an economic profit. the user cost of capital for R&D measures the return that a firm needs to realise on an R&D investment before tax to offset all costs and taxes that arise from the investment, making zero economic profit. Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.