Denmark vs Japan: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal over time
- Denmark
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 56.83 Percentage of taxable income against 56.49 Percentage of taxable income in Denmark, a difference of 0.34 Percentage of taxable income.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 24th and Japan ranks 23rd of 99 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.6 Percentage of taxable income | 42.65 Percentage of taxable income | 40.05 Percentage of taxable income | Japan |
| 2020s | 12.14 Percentage of taxable income | 46.03 Percentage of taxable income | 33.89 Percentage of taxable income | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal, Denmark or Japan?
- Japan, at 56.83 Percentage of taxable income against 56.49 Percentage of taxable income in Denmark as of 2025.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal between Denmark and Japan?
- 0.34 Percentage of taxable income, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal?
- Denmark ranks 24th and Japan ranks 23rd of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.