Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Korea: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal

Democratic Republic of the Congo
43.54 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
Korea
47.6 Percentage of taxable income
in 2025
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
1st
Korea rank
2nd

Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Korea
01020304050201720212025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 47.6 Percentage of taxable income against 43.54 Percentage of taxable income in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 4.06 Percentage of taxable income.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st and Korea ranks 2nd of 3 countries.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Korea Difference Ahead
2010s 35.67 Percentage of taxable income 36.4 Percentage of taxable income 0.723 Percentage of taxable income Korea
2020s 41.34 Percentage of taxable income 43.12 Percentage of taxable income 1.78 Percentage of taxable income Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Korea?
Korea, at 47.6 Percentage of taxable income against 43.54 Percentage of taxable income in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Korea?
4.06 Percentage of taxable income, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Korea?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Korea rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st and Korea ranks 2nd of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Korea: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-corporate-tax-statistics-effective-marginal-tax-rate/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/effective-tax-rates-corporate-tax-statistics-effective-marginal-tax-rate/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/korea/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Korea: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal tax rate
Unit
Percentage of taxable income
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
105 places, 936 data points, 2017–2025
Last refreshed

This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.