Czechia vs Peru: Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal
Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal over time
- Czechia
- Peru
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 99.95 Percentage of taxable income against 95.49 Percentage of taxable income in Peru, a difference of 4.46 Percentage of taxable income.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Peru ahead.
Czechia ranks 8th and Peru ranks 9th of 99 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.63 Percentage of taxable income | 68.06 Percentage of taxable income | 37.43 Percentage of taxable income | Peru |
| 2020s | 99.11 Percentage of taxable income | 81.59 Percentage of taxable income | 17.51 Percentage of taxable income | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal, Czechia or Peru?
- Czechia, at 99.95 Percentage of taxable income against 95.49 Percentage of taxable income in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal between Czechia and Peru?
- 4.46 Percentage of taxable income, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Peru rank globally for effective tax rates - corporate tax statistics — effective marginal?
- Czechia ranks 8th and Peru ranks 9th of 99 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Effective tax rates - Corporate tax statistics — Effective marginal tax rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This table reports synthetic tax policy indicators calculated on the basis of a prospective, hypothetical investment project. Unlike backward-looking ETRs, they do not incorporate any information about firms' actual tax payments.The OECD methodology has been described in detail in the OECD Taxation Working Paper No. 38 (Hanappi, 2018). Further methodological information is available in the explanatory annex.